Hi, On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 08:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/11/10 19:46, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Wed 11-08-10 16:24:35, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> warning: (GFS2_FS && BLOCK && EXPERIMENTAL && (64BIT || LBDAF)) selects QUOTACTL which has unmet direct dependencies (XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA) > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > >> --- > >> fs/quota/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> However, the "depends on" line here seems like overkill to me. > > OK, so do you mean that making QUOTACTL default to 'n', removing the > > depends on line and letting QUOTA, XFS_QUOTA, and GFS2_QUOTA select > > QUOTACTL would be better? > I'm not sure I follow. What is GFS2_QUOTA in this case? GFS2 used to select QUOTA as well, but Christoph removed that. Shouldn't the user interface part of quota be separate from the core implementation? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e9edb1d8a345119c9baafa1b240eb1ec06a44662 Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
