Quoting Christian Stroetmann (stroetmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): > Aloha James, Aloha Kees; > Ont the 02.08.2010 08:57, Kees Cook wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +1000, James Morris wrote: > >>On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > >>>Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again. > >>> > >>>On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK. > > A private NAK against a company's developer's OK > Where is the difference private and company? I thought that it > doesn't matter who and what a developer is, and where she/he comes > from. That's not what private means in this case. A private nak is one made in a private email, so that the list - and the submitter - can't see the rationale. It is problematic because it doesn't really allow the other party to address the objection. (No big deal - Christoph has since responded in public.) -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
