On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > > Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again. > > > > On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK. > > It's the same nak as before -- I concluded there was consensus on the > lists, but was wrong. > > > James, will it stay in security-testing for .37 hopefully? > > Not with this approach, I'd imagine. I'm sorry to appear dense, but the most recent NAK from Christoph was here[1], which was for a patch to Yama that is not in security-testing yet. Prior to that, all I could find was this[2] which explicitly asked me to put stuff in a special LSM. I really would like to see it in mainline, but next steps are not clear. -Kees [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/30/31 [2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/1/78 -- Kees Cook Ubuntu Security Team -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
