On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:11:53 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 July 2010 11:31:07 Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > > We need to update ACL4_VALID_FLAGS to now consider ACL4_MASKED as a > > valid flag. This is also needed for userspace. > > Good point, I missed that. I updated the patch and will push the change to korg after running some test. > > > On a related note, should we move ACL4_MASKED and ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED to > > be the higher bits ? That would make sure we will be able to accomodate > > new flag value NFSv4 define. > > That makes sense, except that ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED hasn't entered the scene in > the patches posted here, and I'm still not convinced that we'll actually need > it. > The userspace change did result in a different output for the below ex: richacl --set 'flags:a 101:w::deny 101:rw::allow 101:w:a:deny 101:rw:a:allow' f this now gives /mnt/d# richacl --get --numeric f f: flags:a 101:-w-----------::deny 101:rw-----------::allow 101:-w-----------:a:deny 101:rw-----------:a:allow that 'w' in rw::allow is redundant, because we have a deny entry before. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
