On Tuesday 20 July 2010 11:31:07 Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > We need to update ACL4_VALID_FLAGS to now consider ACL4_MASKED as a > valid flag. This is also needed for userspace. Good point, I missed that. > On a related note, should we move ACL4_MASKED and ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED to > be the higher bits ? That would make sure we will be able to accomodate > new flag value NFSv4 define. That makes sense, except that ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED hasn't entered the scene in the patches posted here, and I'm still not convinced that we'll actually need it. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
