On 06/27/2010 09:11 PM, Changli Gao wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Tim Gardner<tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fat fingered the original email and didn't get the fsdevel address correct.
-----------------------
Hi,
I have bisected a strange regression down to this commit that you made. If I
apply the attached patch (which restores the original 2 lines of code), then
everything works correctly. I apologize, but I don't have a simple
reproducer. The gist of the problem is that Java cannot decrypt a file under
certain circumstances, e.g., "ERROR javax.crypto.BadPaddingException: pad
block corrupted". There is more information in the bug report at
http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588861 , but not all of it is helpful.
Any thoughts?
It seems the target of sendfile(2) isn't a socket, and the current
sendfile(2) code can't handle non-socket target correctly. Please try
this patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127488508224173&w=2 .
Thanks - this patch appears to have fixed 'pad block corrupted' error.
Is it queued for 2.6.35-rc4 ?
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
