On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fat fingered the original email and didn't get the fsdevel address correct. > > ----------------------- > Hi, > > I have bisected a strange regression down to this commit that you made. If I > apply the attached patch (which restores the original 2 lines of code), then > everything works correctly. I apologize, but I don't have a simple > reproducer. The gist of the problem is that Java cannot decrypt a file under > certain circumstances, e.g., "ERROR javax.crypto.BadPaddingException: pad > block corrupted". There is more information in the bug report at > http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588861 , but not all of it is helpful. > > Any thoughts? > It seems the target of sendfile(2) isn't a socket, and the current sendfile(2) code can't handle non-socket target correctly. Please try this patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127488508224173&w=2 . -- Regards, Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
