On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> npiggin@xxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Allow the shrinker to do per-zone shrinking. This means it is called for
> > each zone scanned. The shrinker is now completely responsible for calculating
> > and batching (given helpers), which provides better flexibility.
>
> Beyond the scope of this patch, but at some point this probably needs
> to be even more fine grained. With large number of cores/threads in
> each socket a "zone" is actually shared by quite a large number
> of CPUs now and this can cause problems.
Yes, possibly. At least it is a much better step than the big dumb
global list.
> > +void shrinker_add_scan(unsigned long *dst,
> > + unsigned long scanned, unsigned long total,
> > + unsigned long objects, unsigned int ratio)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long long delta;
> > +
> > + delta = (unsigned long long)scanned * objects * ratio;
> > + do_div(delta, total + 1);
> > + delta /= (128ULL / 4ULL);
>
> Again I object to the magic numbers ...
>
> > + nr += shrink_slab(zone, 1, 1, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (nr >= 10)
> > + goto again;
>
> And here.
I don't like them either -- problem is they were inherited from the
old code (actually 128 is the fixed point scale, I do have a define
for it just forgot to use it).
I don't know where 4 came from. And 10 is just a random number someone
picked out of a hat :P
> Overall it seems good, but I have not read all the shrinker callback
> changes in all subsystems.
Thanks for looking over it Andi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
