On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:52:58AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > npiggin@xxxxxxx writes: > > > Impelemnt lazy inode lru similarly to dcache. This will reduce lock > > acquisition and will help to improve lock ordering subsequently. > > Or just drop inode LRU completely and only rely on the dcache for that? Possible, yes. There was some talking about it. I prefer not to do anything too controversial yet if possible :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
