On 06/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 06/21, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> >
> > The ability to limit concurrent coredumps allows dumping core to be safely
> > enabled in these situations without affecting responsiveness of the system
> > as a whole.
>
> OK, but please note that the patch is not right,
OOPS, sorry, I was not exactly right too.
> > @@ -1844,6 +1845,7 @@ void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > int retval = 0;
> > int flag = 0;
> > int ispipe;
> > + int dump_count = 0;
> > static atomic_t core_dump_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > struct coredump_params cprm = {
> > .signr = signr,
> > @@ -1865,6 +1867,14 @@ void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > if (!__get_dumpable(cprm.mm_flags))
> > goto fail;
> >
> > + dump_count = atomic_inc_return(&core_dump_count);
> > + if (core_max_concurrency && (core_max_concurrency < dump_count)) {
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Pid %d(%s) over core_max_concurrency\n",
> > + task_tgid_vnr(current), current->comm);
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Skipping core dump\n");
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
>
> We can't return here. We should kill other threads which share the same
> ->mm in any case.
>
> Suppose that core_dump_count > core_max_concurrency, and we send, say,
> SIGQUIT to the process. With this patch SIGQUIT suddenly starts to kill
> the single thread, this must not happen.
well, the caller does do_group_exit() after do_coredump(), this kills
sub-threads.
However, this doesn't kill other CLONE_VM tasks. Perhaps this is fine,
but I am not sure.
> If you change the patch to sleep until core_dump_count < core_max_concurrency,
> then, again, we should kill other threads first.
Yes, this is true. If we are going to sleep, we shouldn't allow other
threads to run.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
