Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 à 22:24 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa a écrit :
> (2010/06/03 22:10), Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:38:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> This is really ugly.
> >>
> >> static inline int sec_copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3)
> >> {
> >> int res = copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3);
> >>
> >> return (res> 0) ? -EFAULT : res;
> >> }
> >
> > It would be unfortunate if it adds more confusion. I'd prefer to have
> > a sufficiently different name. memcpy_to_user/memcpy_from_user
> > perhaps?
>
> Then, and memclear_user() ?
>
> >
>
We are interested by the fact that full copy is done, so maybe use the
'full' prefix ?
fullcopy_to_user() , fullclear_user() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
