Re: [PATCH 0/6] first step toward the new truncate sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:38:51AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:13:53PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >  A second series to deal
> > > with ->setattr will follow and after that we can easily switch
> > > over one filesystem after another.
> > > 
> > > I think this is still 2.6.34 material as it will make the fs
> > > switches a lot easier and avoid introducing the _newtrunc variants
> > > for one kernel release.
> > 
> > No objections from me, but what is the policy on changing exported APIs
> > without changing the name?
> 
> There is no policy, but we do it all the time.

Yeah, just wondering. There is a pseudo don't-break-exported-symbols
thing happening sometimes but while I think it sometimes catches
removed symbols in reviews, more subtle breakage probably usually gets
past.


>  Note that we also change
> the prototypes for all but cont_write_begin so it's an easy to spot
> compile breakage.

True.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux