On Fri, 28 May 2010, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 May 2010, Changli Gao wrote:
> >> Before checking the sd->pos, sd->pos
> >> already is updated with the value returned by splice_read(), so if in
> >> file is seekabble, sd->pos is non-zero when I checking it.
> >
> > I see the logic now. But it's really confusing, at least some
> > comments would be needed.
> >
> > But I think it would be better not to try reusing sd->pos for reading,
> > but supplying an "loff_t *read_ppos" to splice_direct_to_actor and
> > leaving sd->pos alone (for the write side to use and update as
> > necessary).
> >
>
> if (ret < read_len) {
>
> I think is much like a hack too. :)
>
> - sd->pos = prev_pos + ret;
> + if (sd->pos)
> + sd->pos = prev_pos + ret;
> goto out_release;
> }
>
> Anyway, it can fix the issue I mentioned above. Any future cleanup
> should not be mixed in, IMO.
Okay, but please add a comment and explaing in the patch header,
because others are going to look a that code and go "WTF???"
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
