On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Changli Gao wrote:
>> fix updating sd->pos wrongly.
>>
>> In error path, we don't need to updating sd->pos, if the file isn't seekable.
>
> This patch is nonsense. Why should we handle sd->pos != 0 case
> differently?
>
If the in file isn't seekable, its splice_read won't update *ppos, so
in the error path, we'd better not change it too. Otherwise, some
assumption will go wrong.
ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
unsigned int flags)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct tcp_splice_state tss = {
.pipe = pipe,
.len = len,
.flags = flags,
};
long timeo;
ssize_t spliced;
int ret;
/*
* We can't seek on a socket input
*/
if (unlikely(*ppos))
return -ESPIPE;
--
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
