Re: [PATCH 1/2] truncate: introduce new sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/17/2010 08:35 AM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:01:49PM +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> What is the patch's destiny, was it accepted to some dev-tree?
>> If no, please clarify when it will be accepted.
>> Basically want to move newsize_ok check out from vmtruncate
>> to inode_change_ok to fix nasty bugs in setattr() and it is depends
>> on Nick's patch.
> 
> I guess Al hasn't had a chance to look at them yet. I don't think they
> should change much, though. If you want to base patches on top of it,
> that should be fine. I could submit to -mm in the meantime if you like?
> Let me know also if you want the new-truncate filesystem conversions
> (many of them are done).
> 

I will please need the latest one you have for ext2. (Is there a public
tree with all these?). Could you CC: me on the ext2 patch so I can monitor
it's progress, that would be grate.

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux