Re: [PATCH 1/2] truncate: introduce new sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:01:49PM +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> What is the patch's destiny, was it accepted to some dev-tree?
> If no, please clarify when it will be accepted.
> Basically want to move newsize_ok check out from vmtruncate
> to inode_change_ok to fix nasty bugs in setattr() and it is depends
> on Nick's patch.

I guess Al hasn't had a chance to look at them yet. I don't think they
should change much, though. If you want to base patches on top of it,
that should be fine. I could submit to -mm in the meantime if you like?
Let me know also if you want the new-truncate filesystem conversions
(many of them are done).

Thanks,
Nick

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux