On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 16:36 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On 02/27/2010 12:28 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > Yeah, let's give it another round of testing and queue it for .35 - > > > AFAIR Ingo runs also a wide testing effort so it spending another cycle > > > in -tip and being hammered on by us could give us a bit more certainty. > > > > > > > Yes, if we can get into -tip then we'll get more test coverage, so I'll > > queue it up for .35 as soon as the merge window closes. Please remind > > me if I forget. > > Hi Peter, > > I see that you've added the HWEIGHT-capitalized interfaces for > compile-time constants with fce877e3. Which means, the bits in > <include/asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h> from your original patch at > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/4/119 need changing (or have changed already > but I've missed them). > > IOW, where can I get the current version of that last patch so that I can > base my __arch_hweightXX stuff ontop of it for testing? Should all be fine as it is, that patch ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/4/119 ) is against a kernel with fce877e3 in, I've just checked and it still applies to tip/master as of this writing (although it grew a single 2 line offset for 1 hunk). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
