On 02/25/2010 11:47 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:27:25PM -0800 > >> OK, this patch looks pretty good now, but I'm completely lost as to >> what the baseline of this patch is supposed to be. > > Yeah, this is based on PeterZ's http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/4/119 > > But I'm not sure which tree has it... > Looks like -mm, which really means that either Andrew has to take your patch, too, or we have to wait until that is upstream until we can merge your patch. I'm a little nervous about just acking the patch and telling Andrew to test it, because I don't know what the fallout would look like. I'm particularly concerned about gcc version dependencies. I guess, on the other hand, if it ends up not getting merged until .35 it's not a huge deal either. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
