On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05:19:36PM +0800, Li Wang wrote: > Well, does that patch for ioctl_loop06 still make sense? > Or any other workaround? > https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2025-March/042599.html The real question is what block sizes we want to support for the loop driver. Because if it is larger than the physical block size it can lead to torn writes. But I guess no one cared about those on loop so far, so why care about this now.. But if we don't want any limit on the block size that patch looks right.
