Re: [PATCH] the dm-loop target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:34:45PM +0100, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> It is, unless you ensure the pre-allocated and fully provisioned file to be
> immutable.

Which you can't.

> > > The inode fiemap() operation would avoid issues relative to outdated
> > bmap().
> >
> > No, using that for I/O is even worse.
> >
> 
> Are you saying it imposes more overhead than the VFS APIs?

No, but the reporting in fiemap is even less defined than the already
overly lose bmap.  fiemap for btrfs for example doesn't report actual
block numbers.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux