Re: [PATCH] the dm-loop target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:06:16PM +0100, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 4:24 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:57:23PM +0100, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> > > dm-loop avoids the file system abstraction, thus gains the resulting
> > > performance advantage versus the loop driver.
> >
> > How?
> >
> 
> It uses a predefined map and thus avoids VFS -> FS write path overhead
> completelly.

But you simply can't use a "pre-defined map".  It's fundamentally
unsafe.

> The inode fiemap() operation would avoid issues relative to outdated bmap().

No, using that for I/O is even worse.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux