Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: return -EOVERFLOW in generic_remap_checks() when overflow check fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I noticed this patch hasn’t been merged into 6.13. Was it overlooked
or rejected?

Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2024年9月27日周五 19:27写道:
>
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:53:25 +0800, Julian Sun wrote:
> > Keep the errno value consistent with the equivalent check in
> > generic_copy_file_checks() that returns -EOVERFLOW, which feels like the
> > more appropriate value to return compared to the overly generic -EINVAL.
> >
> >
>
> Applied to the vfs.misc.v6.13 branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
> Patches in the vfs.misc.v6.13 branch should appear in linux-next soon.
>
> Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
> new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.
>
> It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
> patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.
>
> Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
> trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.
>
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
> branch: vfs.misc.v6.13
>
> [1/1] vfs: return -EOVERFLOW in generic_remap_checks() when overflow check fails
>       https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/53070eb468a2


Thanks,
-- 
Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux