Hi, I noticed this patch hasn’t been merged into 6.13. Was it overlooked or rejected? Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2024年9月25日周三 16:37写道： > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:28:51 +0800, Julian Sun wrote: > > The overflow check in generic_copy_file_checks() and generic_remap_checks() > > is now broken because the result of the addition is implicitly converted to > > an unsigned type, which disrupts the comparison with signed numbers. > > This caused the kernel to not return EOVERFLOW in copy_file_range() > > call with len is set to 0xffffffffa003e45bul. > > > > Use the check_add_overflow() macro to fix this issue. > > > > [...] > > Applied to the vfs.misc.v6.13 branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. > Patches in the vfs.misc.v6.13 branch should appear in linux-next soon. > > Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a > new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it. > > It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the > patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated. > > Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase, > trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch. > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git > branch: vfs.misc.v6.13 > > [2/3] vfs: Fix implicit conversion problem when testing overflow case > https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/8f3ab2511887 -- Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>
