Re: [PATCH 2/6] VM/NFS: The VM must tell the filesystem when to free reclaimable pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:30:43PM +0800, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:03 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> 
> > "commit" could also be misread as "commit a transaction"?
> > Anyway I think adding an "nfs" limits the scope to NFS thus makes code
> > reading somehow easier. Just a personal feeling.
> 
> How about 'force_commit_unstable' instead? That ties it up to the
> unstable writes rather than NFS.

That would be good, thanks!

Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux