Re: [PATCH 2/6] VM/NFS: The VM must tell the filesystem when to free reclaimable pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:03 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:

> "commit" could also be misread as "commit a transaction"?
> Anyway I think adding an "nfs" limits the scope to NFS thus makes code
> reading somehow easier. Just a personal feeling.

How about 'force_commit_unstable' instead? That ties it up to the
unstable writes rather than NFS.

Cheers
  Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux