Re: [PATCH] fs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 06/01/2010 07:55, Wu Fengguang a écrit :
> The O_* bit numbers are defined in 20+ arch/*, and hence can silently
> overlap. Add a boot time check to ensure the uniqueness as suggested
> by David Miller.
> 
> CC: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  {
> +	/* please add new bits here to ensure allocation uniqueness */
> +	BUG_ON(20 != hweight32(
> +		O_RDONLY	| O_WRONLY	| O_RDWR	|
> +		O_CREAT		| O_EXCL	| O_NOCTTY	|
> +		O_TRUNC		| O_APPEND	| O_NONBLOCK	|
> +		O_SYNC		| FASYNC	| O_DIRECT	|
> +		O_LARGEFILE	| O_DIRECTORY	| O_NOFOLLOW	|
> +		O_NOATIME	| O_CLOEXEC	| O_RANDOM	|
> +		FMODE_EXEC	| FMODE_NONOTIFY));
> +

I cannot test it, but given O_RDONLY is 0, are you sure 20 bits are actually set ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux