Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:06:36 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>, jack@xxxxxxx, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-bcachefs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "conduct@xxxxxxxxxx" <conduct@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <39e8f416-d136-4307-989a-361bf729e688@linuxfoundation.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 04:53:48PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> I tend to use formal style when I speak on behalf of the Code of Conduct
> committee. I would label it as very formal bordering on pedantic.
>  Would you prefer less formal style in the CoC communication?

I would prefer a less passive agressive and more to the point one.

References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Kent Overstreet
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Shuah Khan
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Kent Overstreet
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Shuah Khan
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Shuah Khan
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Kent Overstreet
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Kent Overstreet
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Theodore Ts'o
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
  - From: Shuah Khan

Prev by Date: [PATCH] idr-test: ida_simple_get/remove are deprecated, so switch to ida_alloc/free.
Next by Date: permission checking for F_SET_RW_HINT
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]