Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/24 21:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:47:59PM -0800, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:55:03PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Shuah, would you be willing to entertain the notion of modifying your...

Kent, I'd like to gently remind you that Shuah is not speaking in her
personal capacity, but as a representative of the Code of Conduct
Committee[1], as she has noted in her signature.  The Code of Conduct
Committee is appointed by, and reports to, the TAB[2], which is an
elected body composed of kernel developers and maintainers.

FYI, without taking any stance on the issue under debate here, I find the
language used by Shuah on behalf of the Code of Conduct committee
extremely patronising and passive aggressive.  This might be because I
do not have an American academic class background, but I would suggest
that the code of conduct committee should educate itself about
communicating without projecting this implicit cultural and class bias
so blatantly.

I tend to use formal style when I speak on behalf of the Code of Conduct
committee. I would label it as very formal bordering on pedantic.
Would you prefer less formal style in the CoC communication?

I am open to educating myself.

thanks,
-- Shuah






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux