Re: [REGRESSION] generic/564 is failing in fs-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ted,

On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:42:53 -0400 "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:49:54PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/fs/read_write.c?h=fs-next&id=0f0f217df68fd72d91d2de6e85a6dd80fa1f5c95
> > > 
> > > To Mr. Sun: did you see these regressions when you tested this patch?  
> > 
> > So we should drop this patch for now.  
> 
> My most recent fs-next testing is still showing this failure, and
> looking at the most recent fs-next branch, 
> 
>     vfs: Fix implicit conversion problem when testing overflow case
> 
> still appears to be in the tree.  Can we please get this dropped?
> Thanks!!

I have reverted that commit from the fs-next and linux-next trees for
today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpsO9ondZHhV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux