Re: [REGRESSION] generic/564 is failing in fs-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:49:54PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/fs/read_write.c?h=fs-next&id=0f0f217df68fd72d91d2de6e85a6dd80fa1f5c95
> > 
> > To Mr. Sun: did you see these regressions when you tested this patch?
> 
> So we should drop this patch for now.

My most recent fs-next testing is still showing this failure, and
looking at the most recent fs-next branch, 

    vfs: Fix implicit conversion problem when testing overflow case

still appears to be in the tree.  Can we please get this dropped?
Thanks!!

							- Ted




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux