Re: [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)

[Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>]

hi, Eric,

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 07:25:32PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec
> 
> These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me.  A negative
> regression would be an improvement.  But that is not actually what is meant.
> 
> Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign.

thanks for suggestion! we will refine wording in the future.

> 
> - Eric
>