Re: [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec

These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me.  A negative
regression would be an improvement.  But that is not actually what is meant.

Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign.

- Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux