Re: fuse-io-uring: We need to keep the tag/index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 at 16:02, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 at 15:56, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I'm inclined to do xarray, but still to assign an index (in the order of
> > received FUSE_URING_REQ_FETCH per queue) - should still give O(1).
>
> xarray index is unsigned long, while req->unique is u64, which on 32
> bit doesn't fit.

I suggest leaving this optimization to a later time.  Less code to
review and less chance for bugs to creep in.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux