On 2024/9/26 16:10, Ariel Miculas via Linux-erofs wrote:
On 24/09/26 09:04, Gao Xiang wrote:
On 2024/9/26 08:40, Gao Xiang wrote:
On 2024/9/26 05:45, Ariel Miculas wrote:
...
I honestly don't see how it would look good if they're not using the
existing filesystem abstractions. And I'm not convinced that Rust in the
kernel would be useful in any way without the many subsystem
abstractions which were implemented by the Rust for Linux team for the
past few years.
So let's see the next version.
Some more words, regardless of in-tree "fs/xfs/libxfs",
you also claimed "Another goal is to share the same code between user
space and kernel space in order to provide one secure implementation."
for example in [1].
I wonder Rust kernel VFS abstraction is forcely used in your userspace
implementation, or (somewhat) your argument is still broken here.
Of course the implementations cannot be identical, but there is a lot of
shared code between the user space and kernel space PuzzleFS
implementations. The user space implementation uses the fuser [1] crate
If you know what you're doing, you may know what Yiyang is doing
here, he will just form a Rust EROFS core logic and upstream later.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
