On 2024/9/26 08:40, Gao Xiang wrote:
On 2024/9/26 05:45, Ariel Miculas wrote:
...
I honestly don't see how it would look good if they're not using the
existing filesystem abstractions. And I'm not convinced that Rust in the
kernel would be useful in any way without the many subsystem
abstractions which were implemented by the Rust for Linux team for the
past few years.
So let's see the next version.
Some more words, regardless of in-tree "fs/xfs/libxfs",
you also claimed "Another goal is to share the same code between user
space and kernel space in order to provide one secure implementation."
for example in [1].
I wonder Rust kernel VFS abstraction is forcely used in your userspace
implementation, or (somewhat) your argument is still broken here.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230609-feldversuch-fixieren-fa141a2d9694@brauner
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Cheers,
Ariel
