On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 04:15:43PM GMT, Alice Ryhl wrote: > This patchset contains the file abstractions needed by the Rust > implementation of the Binder driver. > > Please see the Rust Binder RFC for usage examples: > https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231101-rust-binder-v1-0-08ba9197f637@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Users of "rust: types: add `NotThreadSafe`": > [PATCH 5/9] rust: file: add `FileDescriptorReservation` > > Users of "rust: task: add `Task::current_raw`": > [PATCH 7/9] rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapper > [PATCH 8/9] rust: file: add `DeferredFdCloser` > > Users of "rust: file: add Rust abstraction for `struct file`": > [PATCH RFC 02/20] rust_binder: add binderfs support to Rust binder > [PATCH RFC 03/20] rust_binder: add threading support > > Users of "rust: cred: add Rust abstraction for `struct cred`": > [PATCH RFC 05/20] rust_binder: add nodes and context managers > [PATCH RFC 06/20] rust_binder: add oneway transactions > [PATCH RFC 11/20] rust_binder: send nodes in transaction > [PATCH RFC 13/20] rust_binder: add BINDER_TYPE_FD support > > Users of "rust: security: add abstraction for secctx": > [PATCH RFC 06/20] rust_binder: add oneway transactions > > Users of "rust: file: add `FileDescriptorReservation`": > [PATCH RFC 13/20] rust_binder: add BINDER_TYPE_FD support > [PATCH RFC 14/20] rust_binder: add BINDER_TYPE_FDA support > > Users of "rust: file: add `Kuid` wrapper": > [PATCH RFC 05/20] rust_binder: add nodes and context managers > [PATCH RFC 06/20] rust_binder: add oneway transactions > > Users of "rust: file: add abstraction for `poll_table`": > [PATCH RFC 07/20] rust_binder: add epoll support > > This patchset has some uses of read_volatile in place of READ_ONCE. > Please see the following rfc for context on this: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231025195339.1431894-1-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- So, this won't make v6.12 anymore. There already were pretty big changes around files for the coming cycle so I did not also want to throw this into the mix as well. (Sorry that this had to miss it's birthday, Alice.) However, I do intend to merge a version for this for v6.13. There's some wrapping of struct cred and specifically of struct secctx that I can only handwave at. Ideally you get a nod from the LSM maintainers as well but if that doesn't come in I don't see much point in making this sit in limbo indefinitely.
