On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:08:45AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Joe Damato wrote: [...] > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:16:07PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > Using less CPU to get comparable performance is strictly better, even if a > > system can theoretically support the increased CPU/power/cooling load. > > If it is always a strict win yes. But falling back onto interrupts > with standard moderation will not match busy polling in all cases. > > Different solutions for different workloads. No need to stack rank > them. My request is just to be explicit which design point this > chooses, and that the other design point (continuous busy polling) is > already addressed in Linux kernel busypolling. Sure, sounds good; we can fix that in the cover letter. Thanks for taking a look.
