Re: [PATCH] fs,security: Fix file_set_fowner LSM hook inconsistencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:49 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> index 44488b1ab9a9..974bcc1c8f8f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_mprotect, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_lock, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd)
>  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_fcntl, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>          unsigned long arg)
> -LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, file_set_fowner, struct file *file)

As I mentioned in the other thread, I don't want to see the
file_set_owner hook removed at this point in time.  I'm open to the
idea of moving it around, but as of right now I think it is important
to keep it around.

>  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_send_sigiotask, struct task_struct *tsk,
>          struct fown_struct *fown, int sig)
>  LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_receive, struct file *file)

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux