On 2024-06-04 17:57:46 [+0200], Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote: > > - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) || > > + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) || > > I do not like bikeshedding, and no hard feelings... > > But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less* > clear that we also have DL here. Can SCHED_DL be considered a real-time scheduling class as in opposite to SCHED_BATCH for instance? Due to its requirements it fits for a real time scheduling class, right? And RT (as in real time) already includes SCHED_RR and SCHED_FIFO. > -- Daniel Sebastian
