Re: [Lsf-pc] XFS BoF at LSFMM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 6:55 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [adds ritesh to cc]
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 08:23:25AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 8:06 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 08:01:39AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > >
> > > > FYI, I counted more than 10 attendees that are active contributors or
> > > > have contributed to xfs in one way or another.
> > > > That's roughly a third of the FS track.
> > >
> > > FYI, I'm flying out at 4:15pm on Wednesday, and while I try to keep my
> > > time at the airport short I'd still be gone by 3:30.
> >
> > I've penciled XFS BoF at 2:30
>
> Ritesh and Ted and Jan and I were chatting during the ext4 concall just
> now.  Could we have a 30 minute iomap bof at 2:30pm followed by the XFS
> bof after that?  That would give us some time to chat with hch about
> iomap (and xfs) direction before he has to leave.
>
> Alternately, we could announce a lunchtime discussion group on Monday
> following Ritesh's presentation about iomap.  That could fit everyone's
> schedule better?  Also everyone's braincaches will likely be warmer.
>

Seems to me that there will be a wider interest in iomap BoF
Not sure what you mean by lunchtime discussion.
We can move Willy's GFP_NOFS talk to 15:30 and have the iomap BoF
after Ritesh's session.

> > >
> > > But that will only matter if you make the BOF and actual BOF and not the
> > > usual televised crap that happens at LSFMM.
> > >
> >
> > What happens in XFS BoF is entirely up to the session lead and attendees
> > to decide.
> >
> > There is video in the room, if that is what you meant so that remote attendees
> > that could not make it in person can be included.
> >
> > We did not hand out free virtual invites to anyone who asked to attend.
> > Those were sent very selectively.
> >
> > Any session lead can request to opt-out from publishing the video of the
> > session publicly or to audit the video before it is published.
> > This was the same last year and this year this was explicitly mentioned
> > in the invitation:
> >
> > "Please note: As with previous years there will be an A/V team on-
> > site in order to facilitate conferencing and help with virtual
> > participants. In order to leave room for off-the-record discussions
> > the storage track completely opts out of recordings. For all other
> > tracks, please coordinate with your track leads (mentioned below)
> > whether a session should explicitly opt-out. This can also be
> > coordinated on-site during or after the workshop. The track leads
> > then take care that the given session recording will not be
> > published."
> >
> > I will take a note to keep XFS BoF off the record if that is what you
> > want and if the other xfs developers do not object.
>
> Survey: How many people want to attend the xfs bof virtually?
>
> I'd be ok with an OTR discussion with no video, though I reserve the
> right to change my mind if the score becomes chair: 2 djwong: 0. :P

The middle ground is to allow video for the selective virtual attendees
(and trust them not to record and publish) and not publish the video
on LSMFF site.

Thanks,
Amir.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux