On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 8:06 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 08:01:39AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > > FYI, I counted more than 10 attendees that are active contributors or > > have contributed to xfs in one way or another. > > That's roughly a third of the FS track. > > FYI, I'm flying out at 4:15pm on Wednesday, and while I try to keep my > time at the airport short I'd still be gone by 3:30. I've penciled XFS BoF at 2:30 > > But that will only matter if you make the BOF and actual BOF and not the > usual televised crap that happens at LSFMM. > What happens in XFS BoF is entirely up to the session lead and attendees to decide. There is video in the room, if that is what you meant so that remote attendees that could not make it in person can be included. We did not hand out free virtual invites to anyone who asked to attend. Those were sent very selectively. Any session lead can request to opt-out from publishing the video of the session publicly or to audit the video before it is published. This was the same last year and this year this was explicitly mentioned in the invitation: "Please note: As with previous years there will be an A/V team on- site in order to facilitate conferencing and help with virtual participants. In order to leave room for off-the-record discussions the storage track completely opts out of recordings. For all other tracks, please coordinate with your track leads (mentioned below) whether a session should explicitly opt-out. This can also be coordinated on-site during or after the workshop. The track leads then take care that the given session recording will not be published." I will take a note to keep XFS BoF off the record if that is what you want and if the other xfs developers do not object. Thanks, Amir.
