Re: [RFC] iomap: use huge zero folio in iomap_dio_zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 05:46:55AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:31:07PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> > > Well, that's why I suggest doing it at mount time.  Asking for it deep
> > > down in the write code is certainly going to be a bit problematic.
> > 
> > Makes sense. But failing to mount because we can't get a huge zero folio
> > seems wrong as we still can't guarantee it even at mount time.
> > 
> > With the current infrastructure I don't see anyway of geting a huge zero
> > folio that is guaranteed so that we don't need any fallback.
> 
> You export get_huge_zero_page, put_huge_zero_page (they might need a
> rename and kerneldoc for the final version) and huge_zero_folio or a
> wrapper to get it, and then call get_huge_zero_page from mount,

static bool get_huge_zero_page(void)
{
	struct folio *zero_folio;
retry:
	if (likely(atomic_inc_not_zero(&huge_zero_refcount)))
		return true;

	zero_folio = folio_alloc((GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_ZERO) & ~__GFP_MOVABLE,
			HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
	if (!zero_folio) {

We might still fail here during mount. My question is: do we also fail
the mount if folio_alloc fails?

		count_vm_event(THP_ZERO_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED);
		return false;
	}

...
> from unmount and just use huge_zero_folio which is guaranteed to
> exist once get_huge_zero_page succeeded.
> 

-- 
Pankaj Raghav




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux