Re: KCSAN in fuse (fuse_request_end <-> fuse_request_end)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: KCSAN in fuse (fuse_request_end <-> fuse_request_end)
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:10:13 +0200
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Zi/aIkYRU5N03xEC@gmail.com>

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 19:34, Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes, reading ->num_background using READ_ONCE() in the fuse_readahead()
> path fix KCSAN complaint.
>
> Should I sent it for review?

Yes please.

Thanks,
Miklos

References:
- KCSAN in fuse (fuse_request_end <-> fuse_request_end)
  - From: Breno Leitao
- Re: KCSAN in fuse (fuse_request_end <-> fuse_request_end)
  - From: Miklos Szeredi
- Re: KCSAN in fuse (fuse_request_end <-> fuse_request_end)
  - From: Breno Leitao

Prev by Date: Re: [syzbot] [kernfs?] possible deadlock in kernfs_seq_start
Next by Date: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH] epoll: try to be a _bit_ better about file lifetimes
Previous by thread: Re: KCSAN in fuse (fuse_request_end <-> fuse_request_end)
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 2/2] fs/xattr: add *at family syscalls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux