On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 18:18, Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > fuse_request_end() reads and writes to ->num_background while holding > the bg_lock, but fuse_readahead() does not hold any lock before reading > ->num_background. That is what KCSAN seems to be complaining about. > > Should we get ->bg_lock before reading ->num_background? Probably not necessary. Does wrapping that access in READ_ONCE() fix the complaint? Thanks, Miklos
