Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nam Cao <namcao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:31:22 -0400
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240417003639.13bfd801@namcao>

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:36:39AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> 
> However, I am confused about one thing: doesn't this make one page of
> physical memory inaccessible?

So are these riscv32 systems really having multiple terabytes of
memory?  Why is this page in the physical memory map in the first
place?

Inquiring minds what to know,

						- Ted

Follow-Ups:
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Nam Cao

References:
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Björn Töpel
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Mike Rapoport
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Nam Cao
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Nam Cao
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Björn Töpel
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Nam Cao
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Mike Rapoport
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Mike Rapoport
- Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
  - From: Nam Cao

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix shmem_rename2 directory offset calculation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ntfs3: remove warning
Previous by thread: Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
Next by thread: Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]