Re: [PATCH v14 01/12] fs: Return ENOTTY directly if FS_IOC_GETUUID or FS_IOC_GETFSSYSFSPATH fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could we have a test that failed if this patch is not applied?  I'm not
sure this is possible because it would require a device file to handle
FS_IOC_GETUUID, which wouldn't be worth it implementing for this test.


On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:40:29PM +0000, Günther Noack wrote:
> These IOCTL commands should be implemented by setting attributes on the
> superblock, rather than in the IOCTL hooks in struct file_operations.
> 
> By returning -ENOTTY instead of -ENOIOCTLCMD, we instruct the fs/ioctl.c
> logic to return -ENOTTY immediately, rather than attempting to call
> f_op->unlocked_ioctl() or f_op->compat_ioctl() as a fallback.
> 
> Why this is safe:
> 
> Before this change, fs/ioctl.c would unsuccessfully attempt calling the
> IOCTL hooks, and then return -ENOTTY.  By returning -ENOTTY directly, we
> return the same error code immediately, but save ourselves the fallback
> attempt.
> 
> Motivation:
> 
> This simplifies the logic for these IOCTL commands and lets us reason about
> the side effects of these IOCTLs more easily.  It will be possible to
> permit these IOCTLs under LSM IOCTL policies, without having to worry about
> them getting dispatched to problematic device drivers (which sometimes do
> work before looking at the IOCTL command number).
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cnwpkeovzbumhprco7q2c2y6zxzmxfpwpwe3tyy6c3gg2szgqd@vfzjaw5v5imr/
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ioctl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> index 1d5abfdf0f22..fb0628e680c4 100644
> --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int ioctl_getfsuuid(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
>  	struct fsuuid2 u = { .len = sb->s_uuid_len, };
>  
>  	if (!sb->s_uuid_len)
> -		return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> +		return -ENOTTY;
>  
>  	memcpy(&u.uuid[0], &sb->s_uuid, sb->s_uuid_len);
>  
> @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int ioctl_get_fs_sysfs_path(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
>  	struct super_block *sb = file_inode(file)->i_sb;
>  
>  	if (!strlen(sb->s_sysfs_name))
> -		return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> +		return -ENOTTY;
>  
>  	struct fs_sysfs_path u = {};
>  
> -- 
> 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux