On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:42:22PM -0400, Eric Biggers wrote: > Hi Josef and Sweet Tea, > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 05:10:57PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Hello, > > > > v3 can be found here > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1697480198.git.josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > There's been a longer delay between versions than I'd like, this was mostly due > > to Plumbers, Holidays, and then uncovering a bunch of new issues with '-o > > test_dummy_encryption'. I'm still working through some of the btrfs specific > > failures, but the fscrypt side appears to be stable. I had to add a few changes > > to fscrypt since the last time, but nothing earth shattering, just moving the > > keyring destruction and adding a helper we need for btrfs send to work properly. > > > > This is passing a good chunk of the fstests, at this point the majority appear > > to be cases where I need to exclude the test when using test_dummy_encryption > > because of various limitations of our tools or other infrastructure related > > things. > > > > I likely will have a follow-up series with more fixes, but the bulk of this is > > unchanged since the last posting. There were some bug fixes and such but the > > overall design remains the same. Thanks, > > > > Is there a plan for someone to keep working on this? I think it was finally > getting somewhere, but the work on it seems to have stopped. > I fixed up all your review comments, but yes we don't care about this internally anymore so it's been de-prioritized. I have to rebase onto the new stuff, re-run tests, fix any bugs that may have creeped in, but the current code addressed all of your comments. Once I get time to get back to this you'll have a new version in your inbox, but that may be some time. Thanks, Josef
