On Tue 22-09-09 18:23:47, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:16:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > No. We already have one half-finished series here; mixing it with another > > > one is not going to happen. Such flags are tolerable only as bisectability > > > helpers. They *must* disappear by the end of series. Before it can be > > > submitted for merge. > > > > > > In effect, you are mixing truncate switchover with your writepage one. > > > Please, split and reorder. > > > Well, this wasn't meant as a final version of those patches. It was > > meant as a request for comment whether it makes sence to fix the problem > > how I propose to fix it. If we agree on that, I'll go and convert the rest > > of filesystems so that we can remove .new_writepage hack. By that time I > > hope that new truncate sequence patches will be merged so that dependency > > should go away as well... > > Could you carve just the ext4 part of truncate series out of that and > post it separately? Definitely. Actually, I've sent that patch to Nick in private but you're right I should have posted it to the list as well. Will do it in a moment. Thanks for a reminder. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
