On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:21:45PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> CC: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: tytso@xxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 3f1873f..22f49d7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ const struct file_operations ext4_file_operations = {
> };
>
> const struct inode_operations ext4_file_inode_operations = {
> - .truncate = ext4_truncate,
> + .new_truncate = 1,
> .setattr = ext4_setattr,
> .getattr = ext4_getattr,
> #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 58492ab..be25874 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3354,6 +3354,7 @@ static int ext4_journalled_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> }
>
> static const struct address_space_operations ext4_ordered_aops = {
> + .new_writepage = 1,
No. We already have one half-finished series here; mixing it with another
one is not going to happen. Such flags are tolerable only as bisectability
helpers. They *must* disappear by the end of series. Before it can be
submitted for merge.
In effect, you are mixing truncate switchover with your writepage one.
Please, split and reorder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
