> So you are basically saying that for now it is ok to break everybody's > system who tries linux-next and let them bisect, just to figure out they > have to disable a config option? Let me fix that suggestive phrasing for you. You seem to struggle a bit: > I think we should flip the default because this is breaking people who > are trying linux-next and making them bisect which can be annoying. Yes, that was the intent. I probably should've made that clear. What I was trying to do is to flip the default to N and fix the policy. When that is done we should aim to flip back to y.
